Logo

Requirements gathering for
charities and membership organisations

Requirements gathering captures what your technology needs to enable you to do. It is a collaborative process that builds shared understanding across teams and creates a clear statement of needs that guides partner selection and implementation.

Abstract Shapes interlocking

Get clear on what you need
before you choose technology

We work iteratively with your teams to capture charity CRM requirements that are accurate, complete and usable, drawing on experience from more than 550 NFP technology projects. The insight from the process itself is often as valuable as the final requirements document.

What does requirements gathering include?

Requirements gathering is most effective when it is anchored to your organisation's strategic direction, not just today's operational needs.

  • Requirements register

    A complete, prioritised document covering functional, technical and data requirements. Separates essential from desirable so you can evaluate suppliers against consistent criteria, not just demos.

  • Current systems and integrations map

    A clear picture of what exists today and what needs to change, so new systems can be configured correctly from the start.

  • Stakeholder sign-off

    Formal agreement from key stakeholders on what you need. Protects against scope creep and gives leadership confidence the process was thorough.

  • Tender-ready documentation

    Your requirements formatted and ready to use directly in an invitation to tender or RFP, consistent from brief through to evaluation.

Is requirements gathering right for us?

  • You are planning to select a new technology for example CRM, membership management system, finance or digital platform and want to approach that process with clarity
  • Different teams have different views on what the new system should do, and you need a structured way to build shared understanding and resolve those differences
  • Your board or senior leadership needs confidence that the investment decision will be well-founded
  • You want tender documentation that enables partners to understand your needs and respond with accurate proposals, not generic pitches
  • A previous technology project did not deliver what was expected and you want to understand why before starting again

As a fiercely independent consultancy, Hart Square does not sell software, accept commissions, or partner with vendors. Our advice is 100% objective, technology-agnostic, and client-first, built on experience from more than 550 projects with charities and membership organisations.

What you get

How does requirements gathering work?

We work iteratively with your teams throughout the process, not just at the start and end. A typical engagement runs in four stages.

Discovery

Structured workshops with all business areas, including end users, not just leadership, to build a shared understanding of what the organisation needs from a new system.

Documentation

Functional requirements captured for each area, alongside non-functional requirements covering security, performance and documentation needs. Current systems and integrations mapped.

Prioritisation

Agreement on how to distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves, so that when no single system meets every requirement, you have a principled basis for the decision.

Sign-off and pack

A complete requirements document formatted for use in your selection process, with stakeholder sign-off secured where needed.

Investment

Engagements typically range from a focused two-week process for smaller organisations to four to six weeks for larger or more complex projects. We provide a clear scope and fixed-fee proposal before any work begins, so you know exactly what you are committing to.

Square and Circle Abstract Shape

It was so helpful to be able to have allies to question and validate my thinking. Hart Square were very good at coaching me in how to deliver difficult messages across the organisation as we reset the project and appointed new suppliers. They helped us to form a new project team and to align everyone’s interests. We were so keen to retain their input after our ITT process that we appointed them as external project managers

Jon Eaton, Director of Digital Services, Epilepsy Action (25 April 2022)

Requirements gathering: in-house vs. experienced consultancy

Capturing the solution requirements gives everyone a clear understanding of what is needed so the solutions can be implemented to meet those requirements.

And doing so at the outset of the project minimises errors. lowers the overall cost of a project and gives a more accurate picture of how complex a project can be.


According to a NASA study on project costs, “the cost of fixing a requirements error discovered during the requirements phase is defined as one unit, the cost to fix that error if found during the design phase increases to 3–8 units; at the build phase, 7–16 units; at integration and test, 21–78 units; and at the operations phase, 29 units to more than 1,500 units”.

Requirements gathering in-house

  • Independence:
    Internal politics or preferences can influence prioritisation or even technology options
  • Supplier knowledge:
    Organisations will only know their own perspective and are limited to their organisation's experience
  • Common omissions:
    May not have sufficient checks against known issues
  • Stakeholder facilitation:
    Internal facilitators may lack the authority or neutrality to resolve disagreements between teams
  • Output quality:
    Without a training on how to capture requirements, outputs may be variable and may not meet tender or ITT standards or align.
  • Time and resource:
    Internal team time diverted from day-to-day work

Requirements gathering with an experienced consultancy

  • Independence:
    Consultancies should be fully independent with no affiliation with any supplier or technology
  • Supplier knowledge:
    Direct knowledge of what suppliers to the sector need of the requirements to provide accurate estimates
  • Common omissions:
    Trained to spot requirements commonly missed in NFP technology projects
  • Stakeholder facilitation:
    External facilitator can challenge and coach across organisational boundaries
  • Output quality:
    Structured for direct use in an ITT or RFP
  • Time and resource:
    Often fixed cost and duration against a defined scope which can typically be two to six weeks depending on complexity and number of functions within a system

Frequently asked questions

What is involved in requirements gathering?

Requirements gathering involves a structured process of identifying and documenting what your organisation needs from a new system before evaluating suppliers. It covers functional needs, technical requirements, data considerations and integrations, and includes input from the teams who will use the system day to day. The output is a prioritised requirements document that guides procurement and enables objective supplier evaluation.

How do you run a nonprofit CRM requirements process?

A nonprofit requirements process involves facilitated workshops to capture and prioritise needs across business areas, followed by structured documentation and stakeholder sign-off. The process must include end users alongside leadership, and should produce documentation ready to use directly in a tender or RFP. The output clearly distinguishes between essential requirements and desirable features.

What are membership management software requirements?

Membership management software requirements typically cover membership record management and renewals, subscription billing and payment processing, event registration and CPD tracking, communications and member portal functionality, and integration with finance systems. Unlike CRM requirements for donor-focused organisations, membership management software requirements are primarily membership-first, focused on subscription lifecycles, automated renewals and member engagement.

Why do charities need a formal requirements process before selecting a system?

Without a clear requirements document, organisations compare systems without a consistent framework. Suppliers emphasise different features, making proposals hard to evaluate objectively. A proper requirements process makes selection faster and fairer, protects the organisation if a system fails to deliver what was agreed, and ensures the brief to potential partners is clear enough to attract accurate proposals.

How does Hart Square's requirements gathering differ from doing it in-house?

We bring an independent perspective that is harder to maintain internally, particularly on prioritisation. Because we have no affiliation with any technology supplier, our recommendations are based entirely on your needs. We also bring direct knowledge of what suppliers in the sector can and cannot realistically deliver, and the requirements that are commonly missed in NFP technology projects, built across more than 550 projects with charities and membership organisations.

——

Last updated: 05 April 2026 by Joyce Harmon